Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

  1. #1
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

    CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise
    The aircraft carrier Enterprise, aging and one of a kind, may be out of the fleet sooner than expected.

    Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead said he intends to get the required congressional dispensation to decommission the ship in 2012 or 2013, taking the flattop fleet down to 10 ships for a few years until the Gerald R. Ford comes online. That's expected in 2015.

    "We really need to take Enterprise out of service," he told Navy Times. "That ship is old, and it has served extraordinarily well. It has served longer than any aircraft carrier in the history of the United States Navy. And it's time. She's safe. She's going through an availability now. But Enterprise deserves to go to pasture."

    The Big E currently is slated for decommissioning in 2012, pending the congressional waiver.

    "I've got to get relief from the law, but I'd like to get her out in '12 or '13," he said. "What we have to do is go before the authorization committees and make the case [for 10 carriers]."

    Commissioned in 1961, the Enterprise was the world's first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. In 1962, it was part of the 2nd Fleet quarantine of Cuba during the nuclear showdown with the Soviet Union.

    In 1965, the carrier became the first nuclear-powered ship to engage in combat during strikes on North Vietnam.

    Roughead said CVN 65 will deploy one last time — and then that's it.

    Big E's age and number of reactors — eight — mean the decommissioning process will be long, labor-intensive and expensive.

    "Enterprise just doesn't lay up like a conventional ship," he said. "We have never decommissioned a nuclear aircraft carrier, and it's a significant undertaking. We have to get on with that process because it's going to take us a while to do that."

    While Beltway insiders are speculating on an eventual reduction in the carrier fleet down to nine, Roughead said doing without the Enterprise will be feasible until Ford joins the fleet.

    "We have looked at our carriers and carrier schedules to meet the presence requirements from combatant commanders. And because of the Fleet Response Plan we can do it with 10 carriers," he said. "I do believe that our carrier force of 11 is what the nation and the Navy needs to fulfill the presence requirement and the response requirement."

  2. #2
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

    Cost Of Restoring Carrier Enterprise Grows By $6 Million
    The U.S. Navy is finding that keeping the nation's oldest aircraft carrier in the fleet keeps getting more expensive.

    The service announced Wednesday that it is on the hook for an additional $6 million for "emergent and supplemental" work on the USS Enterprise, which is undergoing a 16-month dry-dock maintenance period at Northrop Grumman Corp.'s Newport News shipyard.

    That brings the total cost of the maintenance project on the ship to $480.9 million, about 6 percent higher than its initial $453.3 million price tag.

    Wednesday's contract modification marked the third time Northrop has requested more money to fix the "Big E," which arrived at the Newport News shipyard a year ago.

    In late September, the yard received a supplemental contract for $9.6 million to build various replacement units on the carrier.

    Then in December, Northrop received another $12 million to do work on some of the ship's tanks and piping systems that was not covered under the initial contract.

    The Enterprise still is on schedule to be re-delivered to the fleet in September.

    Because the ship is approaching 50 years old, it's not uncommon for repair projects to require additional funding, as shipyard workers and engineers discover more problems than expected after the ship arrived in the yard for a full inspection.

    While in Newport News, workers will clean, paint and preserve the ship's aging hull and interior tanks; repair and replace valves, pipes and pumps in the ship's nuclear propulsion plant; and make other general repairs to extend the ship's life until at least 2013.

    The carrier is scheduled to make one final deployment before being decommissioned.

    Some members of Congress have suggested that the Navy attempt to extend the ship's life until at least 2015, when the next-generation carrier, Gerald R. Ford, is expected to be complete. But, so far, the Navy hasn't endorsed such a plan.

    The Enterprise was built in Newport News and commissioned in 1961.

  3. #3
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

    Big E Stuck In Yard; Nimitz, Truman Extended
    Sep 14, 2009

    Navy officials on Friday extended the deployments for two aircraft carrier strike groups – Nimitz and Harry S. Truman – by nearly two months each to cover the expected gap in carrier coverage caused by shipyard delays in the maintenance overhaul of the carrier Enterprise.

    Each deployment will run just under eight months, U.S. Pacific Fleet officials in Hawaii and U.S. Fleet Forces Command officials in Virginia announced in a joint statement. "The Navy remains committed to its general policy of maintaining deployment lengths to manage personnel tempo as essential components of force readiness," officials said.

    The short-notice shift in the carriers' schedules includes an earlier departure of the Norfolk, Va.-based Dwight D. Eisenhower carrier strike group, which will leave on its next deployment "a few days earlier," said Cmdr. Phil Rosi, a Fleet Forces Command spokesman, on Friday afternoon.

    Truman, which is preparing to deploy with its strike group, will deploy from its Norfolk berth later than planned for its scheduled next deployment in 2010, Rosi said. He declined to specify the length of that delay before the carrier will deploy from its Norfolk berth.

    San Diego-based Nimitz left home July 31 for a scheduled deployment with its strike group slated to last about six months.

    Enterprise had entered the Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding shipyard in Newport News, Va., last year for an extended dry-dock selected restricted availability that initially would have been completed this summer.

    But now Navy officials expect that work on the 48-year-old Enterprise, which the Navy plans to decommission in 2014, will be completed by December, Rosi said. "The need for the work came up as the ship proceeded through the availability," he said.

    "Adjusting these carrier deployment schedules was the best solution of available options," Adm. J.C. Harvey, Jr., Fleet Forces commander, said in the statement. "We recognize this decision has operational and personnel impacts, such as training cycle changes and family uncertainty."

    Adm. Robert F. Willard, who commands the Pacific Fleet, also acknowledged the impact on sailors and their families. "We will continue to invest in family support and readiness programs to try to reduce the stress of lengthy deployments – we owe it to them, and I am committed to it," Willard said.

  4. #4
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default USS Enterprise Delayed Again; Cost Of Maintenance Balloons 44.5 Percent

    USS Enterprise Delayed Again; Cost Of Maintenance Balloons 44.5 Percent
    April 1, 2010

    The "Big E" is becoming the U.S. Navy's "Big $."

    The Navy this week agreed to spend an additional $13.2 million for maintenance on the USS Enterprise, pushing the cost to repair the fleet's oldest aircraft carrier to nearly $655 million — 44.5 percent higher than the original estimate.

    It's the 11th time in 21 months the service has had to throw more money at the 49-year-old carrier to prepare it for two final deployments before a scheduled 2012 decommissioning.

    At Northrop Grumman Corp.'s Newport News shipyard since May 2008, the aging Enterprise is in its final dry-dock maintenance, originally scheduled to last 16 months and cost $453.3 million.

    The Navy said Wednesday the project should be completed in April, marking the third time the service has postponed the ship's delivery due to unforeseen problems.

    Northrop was scheduled to redeliver the ship to the Navy in September, but the delivery was delayed twice so Northrop could make additional repairs. In February, the Navy said Northrop was scheduled to wrap up the project in March.

    Because the ship is approaching 50 years old and it's the only carrier in its class, Northrop and the Navy said the contract growth was not unexpected.

    "There is no benchmark to compare (Enterprise) to, and the full extent of the work could not be discovered until the construction work actually began," said Margaret Mitchell-Jones, a Northrop spokeswoman.

    The original contract was based on an initial estimate that didn't include what shipyard engineers and waterfront workers could find deep within its hull. Those findings added up quickly — to the tune of at least $200 million — and combine to make the Big E's final two years in service a costly venture.

    Built in Newport News, the Enterprise was the world's first nuclear-powered carrier.

    Northrop has a contract with the Navy to provide all remaining maintenance for the ship.

  5. #5
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Big E Preps For Final Combat Deployment

    Big E Preps For Final Combat Deployment
    September 23, 2010

    Friday marks 50 years since this ship’s launch and champagne christening, so its crew has been doing some back-of-the-envelope math: Just how many people — pilots, maintainers, aircraft handlers, nuclear engineers, boatswain’s mates, mess cranks, the lot — have served on Enterprise over its life?

    “Near as we can figure, it’s about a quarter of a million,” said the commanding officer, Capt. O.P. Honors. “That’s unlike any ship out there. It’s absolutely awesome.”

    Enterprise is beginning the end of a career brimming with those kinds of superlatives: The world’s first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, which is also the Navy’s longest-serving active warship, which carries the most reactors ever put to sea — eight, two per screw, in the most complex such plant ever fielded — is working up for its 21st and final combat deployment. Then it will become the first U.S. nuclear carrier ever decommissioned.

    But Honors isn’t the custodian of a museum just yet, he said. Until Enterprise comes home for the last time, he said, it remains a capital warship that needs to be just as ready to fight as the fleet’s newest carrier, George H.W. Bush, which was docked one pier over in Norfolk Va., when Big E, with Navy Times tagging along, came back Sept. 9 from a six-week trip to sea.

    “We want to sprint to the finish line,” Honors said. “We do not want to limp across.”

    To make that happen, the Navy spent more than $613 million on two years’ worth of shipyard work for Enterprise, which officials hope will be the last in its tradition of budget- and schedule-busting upkeep. More superlatives there: From the first, Enterprise was so expensive it prompted the Navy to make the carriers America and John F. Kennedy conventionally powered, rather than nuclear as designed. Big E has absorbed billions of dollars in maintenance and upgrades ever since.

    So after its recent work, Enterprise is in the best possible shape for its swan song, Honors said, notwithstanding its ongoing need for certain kinds of special attention. Some pieces of gear onboard today are original to the Enterprise, and like the ship itself, remain the only examples of their kind.

    “The people who designed and built the equipment for this ship — they’ve been dead for 25 years,” Honors said. “When this ship was commissioned, I was 3 months old. Think of a car that was built 49 years ago, you’ve been driving it the whole time, and they only built one of them, and it was a technology demonstrator. There’s no store that we can go to. There’s no Pep Boys for the Enterprise.”
    The old-fashioned way

    If Enterprise needs extra skill and extra care below decks to keep going, the ship still fulfills its raison d’être, launching and recovering aircraft, as well as it ever has, crew members said.

    Enterprise handled 2,080 arrested landings during its six weeks underway this summer, said air boss Cmdr. Wesley Bannister, and for pilots and their aircraft, flying on and off the ship is no different from any other carrier. But features throughout the ship show the origins of their modern descendants on new ships like Bush: Enterprise has a narrow notch at the stern with less room to park aircraft and a much smaller primary flight control, and it retains the “horns” once used with its original bridle-style catapults.

    The ship also does not have enclosed “bubbles” at the bow or along the port deck edge, where shooters on Nimitz-class carriers launch aircraft. Shooter Lt. Zach LaPointe said he likes having the closer connections to his team.

    “It puts you right up there with everyone else,” he said. “If it’s raining and storming, you’re up there with the guys. If we’re in the Persian Gulf and it’s 150 degrees up there, you’re up there with the guys.”

    There’s also less room on the flight deck and in the hangar bay than on newer ships, which demands a higher level of skill and patience, said Senior Chief Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Aircraft Handling) (AW/SW/EXW) Scott Bowman, who is in his second stint aboard.

    “It’s more challenging to move aircraft on here, so you have to use a lot more teamwork. But once you master it, it’s very rewarding,” he said. “I came back because I love this ship. But it’s a lot smaller than a Nimitz, so you’ve got to take full advantage of every little area you’re working in.”

    The biggest single hurdle for aircraft handlers is that Enterprise’s hangar bay splits into two sections, while Nimitz-class carriers have three, Bowman said. And although the various models of Navy and Marine F/A-18 Hornet fighter jets are smaller than many of the aircraft Enterprise has carried in its long career — from the F-14 Tomcat to the A-3 Skywarrior — they can still make for a tight squeeze.
    Life on a legend

    Enterprise has had so many alterations and additions that it can feel as much like a contemporary art sculpture as a warship, with clear seams in the metal all over the ship as evidence of many welders’ handiwork. Boxes, dials and other equipment carry red signs that say “retired in place,” meaning that, although they don’t work anymore, the Navy doesn’t think it’s worth the effort to fix them or even rip them out.

    And although any supercarrier is big and confusing at first, Enterprise has a distinct M.C. Escher quality, with spaces that can be reached only after baffling trial and error.

    “It definitely takes awhile to learn your way around at first, but you end up learning real quick because you’re walking around so much,” said Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Aircraft Handling) Airman Josh Manes.

    Manes is one of hundreds of junior newcomers for whom Enterprise’s eccentricities are just a normal part of getting used to their first ships.

    “I’ve got nothing to compare it to, but so far, it’s not bad,” said Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Aircraft Handling) Airman Apprentice Hillary Nimrichter.

    A saltier newcomer also gave Big E a thumbs up, having come from his own line of older ships. Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Aircraft Handling) 1st Class (AW/SW) Hakeem Brobbey has moved helicopters aboard the amphibious ships Saipan, Nassau and Ponce, and he welcomes the extra space and different dynamics of working in Enterprise’s hangar bay. But it’s a qualified endorsement:

    “The food is better,” he said. “The gym sucks. But you have to adapt to different circumstances and make it work. You’ve got to get used to it. You’ve got to take the good with the bad.”

    Built long before the era of personal fitness, the Enterprise didn’t get a dedicated gym until an overhaul in 1996, when workers added a kind of mezzanine space above the forward port side of the hangar bay. It’s nice, sailors said, but too small to handle the demand, and so exercise machines have sprouted up in batches wherever there’s empty space on the ship, including the starboard half of the admiral’s flag bridge.

    Master Chief Culinary Specialist (SW) Thaddeus Wright accepted Brobbey’s compliment about the food, but said that he and his sailors also have to put in extra effort to do their jobs in Enterprise’s comparatively small dining areas.

    “One of the challenging things is the amount of seating space that I’m limited to,” he said. “We need to have a constant churn of my [food service assistants] wiping off tables and making room for the next sailor to sit down.”
    The end of the line

    If Big Navy had its choice, Enterprise would not be setting its latest longevity records this month or mark 50 years since its commissioning on Nov. 25, 2011. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead has said he wants to get Big E out of the fleet as soon as possible. The Navy has asked Congress for an exemption to the law that mandates it field 11 aircraft carriers, to account for the time between when Enterprise leaves the fleet and the carrier Gerald R. Ford enters service, planned for 2015.

    With all this pressure to get rid of Enterprise, what will happen to it? Online petitioners and naval enthusiasts want the ship to become a museum, but Honors said that probably won’t happen.

    Once the Navy dismantles and recycles the ships’ reactors, there will be nothing left to turn into a museum, he said; virtually everything two decks below the hangar bay would have to be cut apart. Honors did mention that it might be possible to slice off Enterprise’s iconic island and use it as a memorial, but those decisions are above his paygrade, he said.

    “Fortunately, my job is not to inactivate the ship,” he said. “My job is to operate the ship until its work is done.”

  6. #6
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

    USS Enterprise: The Beginning of the End for the “Big E”
    October 31, 2011

    There was a time when USS Enterprise was the most famous ship in the world. It still is, but these days, most people think of the fictional starship rather than the world’s first nuclear-powered carrier. The real USS Enterprise was commissioned in 1961, which means that its long career of service must soon draw to a close. In April 2008, a $453.3 million contract covered the ship’s Extended Drydocking Selected Restricted Availability for maintenance and upgrades – but reached over $660 million before all was said and done, and took 2 years.

    That will keep “the Big E” going for a few more years. By 2014, however, USS Enterprise is scheduled to fade into history, to be replaced by the first ship [CVN 78] of the Gerald R. Ford Class. This time, there will be no reruns or syndication deals. When the end comes, plans and facilities for permanently decommissioning the ship and dealing with its 8 nuclear reactors will need to be ready…

  7. #7
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise


    Shatner To Attend USS Enterprise Retirement Event

    November 29, 2012

    Capt. James T. Kirk will be on hand when the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise is officially retired.

    A publicist for William Shatner tells the Daily Press that the actor will attend the ship's inactivation ceremony Saturday at Naval Station Norfolk. Shatner is scheduled to perform Friday in Newport News, Va.

    Shatner played Kirk at the helm of the starship Enterprise in the "Star Trek" television series and in several movies.

    The world's first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier returned to Norfolk from its final deployment earlier this month. Saturday's inactivation will be its last public ceremony.

  8. #8
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

    hahahaha ok, that's kinda funny.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  9. #9
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

    Kirk won't be born for a few more years... 221 more years to be precise.

    James T. Kirk will be born in 2233 in Riverside, Iowa. He was raised there by his parents, George and Winona Kirk.
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  10. #10
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  11. #11
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

    Ha! Ha! Never knew that existed!

  12. #12
    Expatriate American Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A Banana Republic, Central America
    Posts
    48,612
    Thanks
    82
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise

    They wanted a bust for "Kirk" but apparently there was some exorbitant fee that Paramount wanted to charge and they said "Never mind". So instead they put up something like a grave marker lol
    Libertatem Prius!


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 15 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.




  13. #13
    Creepy Ass Cracka & Site Owner Ryan Ruck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    25,061
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 78 Times in 76 Posts

    Default Re: CNO Wants Faster Decommissioning For Enterprise


    Navy To Give Final Farewell To USS Enterprise, World’s 1st Nuclear-Powered Carrier, Next Week

    January 25, 2017



    The world’s first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier will be decommissioned next week in what will be the final farewell to a warship that has played a role in major world events from the 1962 Cuban missile crisis to the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    The USS Enterprise has spent the past several years being defueled and dismantled at Newport News Shipbuilding, the shipyard where it was built and refueled.

    The “Big E,” as it was affectionately called by its crew, was inactivated from service in 2012 in front of about 12,000 people in a ceremony at Norfolk Naval Station after completing its 25th deployment.

    The decommissioning ceremony is a long-honored naval tradition that retires a ship from service through a variety of ceremonial services, including lowering the ship’s commissioning pennant.

    The Feb. 3 ceremony is closed to the public, but the Navy said Wednesday the entire event will be posted on its Facebook page. About 100 people are expected to attend at Newport News Shipbuilding.

    The ship joined the fleet in 1961 and has an active veterans’ group dedicated to preserving its history, which includes launching the first aircraft strikes in Afghanistan following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorism attacks on the U.S.

    The carrier was the eighth Navy ship to bear the name Enterprise, which dates to the Revolutionary War. The Navy has said a future Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier also will be called Enterprise.

    Sailors from the carrier’s final crew built a time capsule from parts of the ship and allowed former sailors to fill it with notes and mementos. The time capsule will be opened by the commanding officer of the next Enterprise.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •