A list of common questions and misconceptions about the Trans-Asian Axis with responses to them.



What is the Trans-Asian Axis?
 The Trans-Asian Axis is a global anti-American/anti-Western alliance headed by Russia and China with its ultimate goal being the downfall of America and the West.

It seeks to align with and foment leftist governments throughout the world with inroads being made in regions such as South/Central America, Europe, Africa, and Asia. It includes ties to various Marxist and Islamic terrorist organizations the world over.

We here at TransAsianAxis.com make it our goal to research and spread the word about the Trans-Asian Axis in an effort to counter and turn back their efforts against America and the West.
 [TOP]

What is the The Final Phase?
 The Final Phase is the last step of a long-term deception/geopolitical plan described by Anatoliy Golitsyn. It was devised by the Soviet Union, and supported by China, that seeks to disarm America and the West which culminates in the fall of America and Western values in general (i.e. representative government, capitalism, freedom).

[TOP]

Who is Anatoliy Golitsyn?
 Anatoliy Golitsyn is a Soviet KGB officer that defected to the West in 1961.

Golitsyn attempted to warn that the Soviet Union had planned and was implementing, with the help of China and various other leftist parties, a long-range deception plan that would cause the West to disarm and even embrace some members of this deception.

Golitsyn forecasted that aspects of this deception would include such events as the fall of the Berlin Wall, dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, a Sino(Chinese)-Soviet split, implementation of false freedoms within Russia, and numerous others as outlined in his books New Lies For Old and The Perestroika Deception. With all of these forecasts, Golitsyn boasts an approximate 94% accuracy rating.
[TOP]

Why should I believe what Golitsyn has said?
Anatoliy Golitsyn held the rank of Major within the Soviet KGB. While with the KGB he served as a senior analyst in the NATO section of the Information Department and served in Vienna and Helsinki on various counterintelligence assignments. He graduated from the Moscow School of Military Counter-espionage, the counterintelligence faculty of the High Intelligence School, the University of Marxism-Leninism and, completed a course with the High Diplomatic School. He also graduated with a law degree from a four-year course at the KGB Institute in Moscow.

As was previously noted, Golitsyn holds an approximate accuracy rating of 94% (as analyzed by researcher Mark Riebling) in his intelligence forecasts with 139 out of 148 of his "falsifiable predictions" coming true. Only after reading Golitsyn's above listed books can one grasp the true breadth and depth of his precision.

Also, such intelligence estimates and information come not just from Golitsyn but several other Soviet/Communist defectors. That list of defectors echoing Golitsyn includes: [TOP]

Haven't the Russians and Chinese been enemies? Why would they cooperate so intimately now?
 This perceived "split" is an aspect of the long-term deception strategy that was intended to drive the West toward China. The main goal being to dupe the West into building up China militarily and economically since Russia could not conceivably undertake the task on its own. The US jumped at the chance for this buildup in hopes that we could leverage China against Russia.

In reality, we were only "selling them the rope with which to hang us"…

As we can see with today's mammoth industrial off-shoring, this ploy has obviously been a huge success with China becoming an economic powerhouse that is forecasted to surpass the US in coming years. Much of this economic growth has gone toward significant increases in the Chinese military with them having double-digit growth in military spending for approximately the last 10 years. And that is only the publicly acknowledged military budget!

The Russians and Chinese determined that the only way in which to conclusively remove all doubt from Western minds about the authenticity of the "split" was to stage a series of border incidents. After all, if solders were dieing on both sides there was no way such a split could not be real! However, being that Communists hold such a low regard for human life (Communism is believed to have killed nearly 150 million people), such "small" sacrifices for the bigger picture were negligible to them.

While relations between the two countries at times have hit bumps, this can mostly be attributed to competition between Communist parties. Much the same way as pack dogs will not always get along but will hunt down prey cooperatively, so too will the Russians and Chinese cooperate to bring down America.

The reason for the cooperation can largely be summed up as being the classic goals of Communism. They wish to dominate the world and bring about an end to Capitalism, Democracy, freedom, and numerous other Western values. Instead of each "taking on" America separately, they realize that with combined forces, they are a much more formidable force and more likely to realize their goals.

Further in depth analysis on this falsified "split" can be obtained by reading Anatoliy Golitsyn's New Lies For Old, namely Chapter 16.
[TOP]

Isn't the Russian military just a shadow of its former self since the end of the Cold War?
 From what we have seen, it would appear that the Russian military is indeed weak.

However, these are assessments based on what we have been allowed to see. The Russians are masters of deception or as they call it maskirovka. In his book Deception : The Invisible War Between the KGB & the CIA, Edward Jay Epstein details the extent to which the Russians have gone to deceive Western intelligence in the past. And with such a track record, we are to believe that with the falling of the Berlin Wall that they magically changed the way they lived for more than 80 years?

What is not being shown are things such as the Yamantau Mountain complex that the Russians have been working on constantly for a number of years. It is estimated that it contains an underground area roughly the size of metropolitan Washington DC. What could you hide in such a large area?

The Yamantau Mountain complex is just one of a number of happenings of which little is known about. Other little known happenings include: And that is just a small collection of events. There are simply too many to list here.

[TOP]

Russia and China wouldn't dare attack us, we have the most advanced military in the world!
 We do indeed have the greatest military in the world and owe a huge debt of gratitude to those serving our country. However, we are not invincible. The Roman army was, at one time, the greatest military force in the world too.

While we have the greatest military in the world we have reduced it dramatically from its full potential. Since the "end" of the Cold War, we have reduced our military to about 1/3 of what it was at the height of the Cold War. And while our military has some of the best weaponry and gear available, a good amount of it is expensive to build and/or replace. On top of the high cost of some systems we severely lack the manufacturing infrastructure, due largely to industrial "off shoring", to go to a manufacturing "war footing" (as we did with WWII) should the need arise.

One specific example of this lack of industrial base is Magnequench. Magnequench is a company that specializes in manufacture of rare earth magnets. These rare earth magnets are a critical part to the guidance systems of the US Military's "smart bombs". The Magnequench factory, in 2003, was "off shored" to none other than China. As such, we are now at China's whim when it comes to supplying a critical component to our "smart bombs". In addition, China has gained a rather sensitive weapons technology that can be used to enhance their own arsenal.

Despite having a first rate military, the War on Terror is currently a significant strain on our current capabilities. Equipment is aging and being used heavily. Naval vessels are shrinking in numbers but increasing in deployments. Precision weapons are being used up quickly but are much slower to be replenished. Airlift capability is taxed heavily.

It is completely conceivable that while fighting the War on Terror, our forces may need to engage in other theaters such as North/South Korea, Taiwan, South America, or even elsewhere in the Middle East. If such additional requirements arise, our forces will be burdened further to a point where our homeland is nearly defenseless. As a result of our already overtaxed forces being stretched to a breaking point, Russia and China would likely seize the opportunity to directly attack us. With Russia and China having their hands in all these tension points (and more) the world over, this seems to be their method of preparing us for the slaughter.
 [TOP]

Russia and China wouldn't dare attack us, we would use nuclear weapons against them at the first signs of aggression!
 While the United States maintains a robust nuclear arsenal, there are a number of factors that could prevent its use either partially or completely.

While President Bush has, in essence, with the most recent revision of nuclear weapons doctrine rescinded the Presidential Decision Directive (PDD-60) of the Clinton era that restricted nuclear weapons use to only after absorbing a first strike, there are still a number of deficiencies.

The first and largest deficiency is the dismantlement of the Strategic Air Command (SAC). The SAC represented one of the largest "legs" of the United States' nuclear triad. The SAC had hundreds of tactical and strategic bombers on 24 hour alert, hundreds of air bases, thousands of highly trained personnel, hundreds of support aircraft, and most importantly hundreds of nuclear weapons ranging from cruise missiles to gravity bombs. With the loss of SAC's 24 hour readiness, the US sacrificed a large part of its nuclear deterrent. While the US does maintain the ability to use nuclear weapons via aircraft, the United States has lost the complete and total war fighting ability inherent with the SAC. For an overview of what was lost when the SAC was disbanded, see this piece at GlobalSecurity.org

The second largest deficiency in the United States nuclear forces is the removal of submarine launched ballistic missile (SLBM) launch codes from the ballistic missile submarines. This was done by the Clinton administration to supposedly reduce the chances of an "accidental" nuclear war. In reality, this not only showed a complete lack of faith in the highly professional men entrusted with this great responsibility but, this severely weakened the second leg of our nuclear triad. By removing the nuclear launch codes from the submarines, this means that the sub captains now must contact an authority, likely in Washington DC, in order to deploy the sub's nuclear weapons. As a result, if a surprise decapitation strike (which the Russians hold as their primary war plans against the US) was launched and sufficient command structure was destroyed, the ballistic submarines would be unable to launch their missiles in a last-ditch retaliatory strike as their original role intended.

Not only have the submarines been rendered nearly impotent by the removal of the launch codes, they are also neutered by various treaty obligations that the US has entered into. Treaty obligations which the US consistently abide by and the Russians constantly ignore. One treaty obligation requires the US ballistic missile submarine force to be cut to 14. The US plans to abide by this by converting 4 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) to guided cruise missile submarines (SSGNs). While they will likely retain the ability to launch cruise missile based nuclear weapons, cruise missiles have the distinct disadvantage of being much slower than a ballistic missile. Thus, a slow cruise missile is much more easily destroyed than a supersonic ballistic missile warhead. In addition, the Russians procrastinate in dismantling older SSBNs for "lack of money" all the while launching a new SSBN class, the Borei.

Along with the problems plaguing our nuclear war fighting capability comes another important problem. Does the leadership of the United States have the will to use nuclear weapons? With the number of liberals in positions of high power in the country, the clarity of the use of our nuclear arsenal becomes murkier. This problem worsens further if such a liberal were to hold an office as high as the Presidency. Liberals, however, aren't the only problem with the will to use nuclear weapons. Another problem would likely stem from bumbling bureaucrats who cannot make a decision without first taking an opinion poll. Such a lack of decisive leadership makes even the most potent nuclear arsenal utterly useless.

In the even that all such problems are overcome, there are other hurdles our enemies have placed. Russia and China have both invested heavily in civil defense measures despite the supposed end of the Cold War. They have built and stocked mass shelters, they have organized evacuation routes for major cities, and they are stockpiling strategic materials just to name a few measures they have taken.

To compliment their civil defense measures, China and (more specifically) Russia have invested in anti-ballistic missile technology. While China is a relative new-comer to ABM, Russia has invested extensively in such technology. Russia has had nuclear tipped ballistic missile interceptors deployed throughout Russia for quite some time, even during the 1972 ABM Treaty they were supposedly adhering to. They continue such development to this day with "air defense" systems such as the S-300 and S-400. These systems are supposed to be anti-aircraft defenses, however, it has been discovered that with minor hardware and programming changes these systems can be used in an ABM role. As was mentioned, China is new to ABM tech but is making strides. They have purchased numerous Russian S-300/400 systems and also are in development of an indigenous system similar to the S-300/400.

In conclusion, while our nuclear arsenal is great, it is not the cure-all that some believe it is.
 [TOP]

America has the best intelligence services in the world! Surely they would see something as obvious as preparations for war against the US!
 While it is true that we have many good men and women working hard in our intelligence services to protect America they, like us, are human and are capable of error and, more importantly, are capable of being deceived. And deception is one area where the Axis more than excels.

Those expecting our intelligence apparatus to detect a decades old plan of mass deception are forgetting that this is the same intelligence that missed the 2001 terror attacks. The same intelligence services that did not see the "break up" of the USSR. And the same intelligence services that has made a whole host of other mistakes and failures.

A large amount of this deficiency can be chalked up to orders forcing the intel services to follow politically correct paths (covering up Able Danger, for example) and suffer rather large budget cuts. Both of which can be attributed to the Clinton administration. Yet another reason is high numbers of liberal, anti-American political hacks left over from the Clinton years. And the last and most important, overt infiltration of the intelligence services by agents from enemy nations.

As stated previously, intelligence services and even its satellites and high-tech means are not immune to large scale deception operations. Especially when their findings fit into their pre-existing paradigm (i.e. dissolution of the Soviet Union)!

An excellent example of this deception is an event that occurred in the 1960s. At this time American intelligence, by using its "most advanced sources and methods", assessed that the Soviets could not achieve high accuracy with their ICBMs because they could not produce accelerometers of sufficient quality. They had determined this by intercepting Soviet missile telemetry from these accelerometers. These accelerometers transmitted data back to the Soviets on 9 separate channels. The intelligence services analyzed that telemetry data and found wide variations between the 9 accelerometers which were all supposed to be measuring the same thing. Analysts were confused by the results they intercepted for a couple reasons. The first reason being that the readings for each accelerometer was so far off. The second reason being that the Soviets were using 9 accelerometers when only 3 should have been needed (one to measure each of the 3 axis [x, y, and z]). The analysts concluded that this discrepancy between readings was due to the Soviets producing substandard accelerometers. This conclusion was backed by the fact that the Soviets were using 9 accelerometers which meant that the Soviets couldn't trust their normal 3 and thus would have to resort to averaging the readings of all three sets.

On top of this poor accelerometer data, there had been a couple other events which further cemented American intel's belief that Soviet accelerometers were lacking. The first was a high profile arms transfer bust in which a Soviet agent was arrested for trying to purchase American accelerometers. A second was when a defector to America from the USSR disclosed that the Soviets were having problems getting their warheads to separate from the missiles (a job the accelerometers do).

American intelligence believed that the Soviets would base their future military strategy around this problem by targeting their missiles on cities instead of missile silos (which require fairly accurate ICBMs). This meant that, at best, the Soviets could field ICBMs that were defensive only since they could not effectively attack America's missiles first. With this information from the US intelligence services, decision makers believed that the Soviet Bear's teeth were far less sharp and our missiles were more than safe from Soviet first strike. Unfortunately, they were wrong. Dead wrong.

In 1968, the Soviets began successfully testing MIRV warheads and other highly sophisticated missile systems. None of which the Soviets should have been capable of building because of their inferior accelerometers. However, here they were!

This prompted a re-analysis of the original data. What the Soviets had done was allow certain accelerometers to broadcast blatantly wrong data while others worked perfectly. When American analysts believed that the Soviets would be forced to average the data to achieve proper results, they did the same and this resulted in completely incorrect findings.

The arms deal that was set up to buy accelerometers turned out to be a ruse. And, the "defector" that claimed the Soviets were having problems with warhead separation turned out to be a false defector that returned to Moscow and lived (a real defector would have been killed). All of which was meant to bolster the American intelligence services' belief that the Soviets could not produce accurate accelerometers and therefore had substandard missiles.

The Soviets knew, from word given to them by defectors involved in analyzing Soviet missile telemetry, what means and methods America would be using to watch their missile tests. Thus, when it came time to launch, the Soviets knew exactly what the Americans would be watching. The Soviet scientists (with KGB guidance) knew which devices' data was true and which was false and the American intelligence agencies did not.

The reason for such deception on such a seemingly trivial matter is as follows. If the US had known about the accuracy of the latest generation of Soviet ICBMs, the US would have followed through with plans to deploy rail-mobile missiles and/or further harden existing missile silos. Both of which would have defeated the preemptory threat this new generation of missiles posed. But, by falsely putting forth these new missiles as being so highly inaccurate, the Soviets increased their potential for winning a "Pearl Harbor style" attack. This grave error in intelligence analysis due to deception put the US in danger of falling victim to a Soviet sneak attack.

Today, many of the same type of errors are being made in regard to the Trans-Asian Axis.

People say the Soviet Union fell apart because they want to believe that we won the Cold War. People say that Russia and China could never be staunch allies because they want to believe that they are too different. People say that China would never attack us because they want to believe that China would never want to destroy their biggest trading partner. People say that the Communists could never form an alliance with Islam because one is secular and the other is spiritual because that is what they want to believe. And on, and on it can go… Yet deeply looking at the information reveals otherwise.
 [TOP]

Why would Russia and, especially, China kill off the world's "Golden Goose"? Wouldn't their economies collapse along with ours because they attacked us?
 Simply put, it is their intention to kill the Golden Goose. This way they become the Golden Goose themselves. After all, who needs competition in the Golden Goose business?

They intend for the world to no longer be beholden to the United States but to them instead. It is comparable to the saying of "It is better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven".

And it is the same reason that the lead dog in a dog pack always watches his back because, there are always other dogs looking to kill him and take his place. Unfortunately, we in the United States no longer seem willing to watch our back. We have grown too complacent and lazy in our modern day society.

Even if Russia and China succeed in bringing down the US, there will eventually be problems between them. Just as there were between Russia and Nazi Germany despite the fact that they were both Socialist nations (Russia adhered [adheres] to International Socialism and Nazi Germany adhered to National Socialism). Each did not want competition from the other and thus they eventually waged war against one another.
 [TOP]

Russia has joined the civilized world and become a free-market democracy!
 Many people said the same thing about Russia during the 1920s when Lenin enacted the New Economic Policy or NEP.

The NEP was enacted by Lenin under threat of revolt by the people and collapse of the Russian government. There were uprisings. The industry and agriculture were in shambles. And, the world was essentially united in its hatred of Communism and the new Soviet state. It was because of this "perfect storm" against the Russians that Lenin enacted the NEP

During this NEP, there were many perceived increases in freedoms in Russia and, Russia seemed to extend an olive branch to the rest of the world. There were numerous concessions made to western industry to spur investment in Russia. There were amnesties granted toward those in exile in hopes that they would return to the Motherland and sing the praises of the new government. Money in private hands, private trade and, private property were actively encouraged. And Russia made it publicly known that it wished for peaceful coexistence with the West.

The Russian leadership intended that this NEP would bring in new industry and foreign capital to Russia. They also intended that these new "freedoms" would act as a relief valve for the internal tensions that were rising because of the reign of terror the Russian citizens lived under.

Ultimately, the NEP succeeded. The West invested heavily in Russia monetarily and built an industrial base for them. A number of those previously in exile returned to Russia and did indeed proclaim how great this new Russian government was. The rest of the world also accepted the Russian overtures of peace and façade that Communism was losing its revolutionary zeal.

But, when 1929 rolled around, Stalin brought Lenin's program to completion. All Western capital, investments, and businesses were seized and appropriated by the Russian government. Those previously exiled were given show trials and executed or put into gulags. The private property and capitalistic elements were eliminated and seized by the state. And there was as Stalin put it, "a Socialist offensive on all fronts".

Overall, the NEP was a success with the exception of smaller than expected Western credits. Many essential factories that were eventually seized were built there by Western companies. Also, many "enemies" of the Russian state were lured back and either executed or imprisoned. And, the pressure of revolt that had been building had been relieved.

With the success of the first NEP, a second NEP was started in the late eighties. Russia was again suffering economically and could not compete with the powerhouse of American capitalism. As such, we saw many things including the "fall" of the Soviet Union that were done to lull the West into complacency again, much the way that Mikhail Gorbachev's quote on our front page describes.

Once Russia sufficiently builds itself up militarily and economically and, once America disarms militarily and weakens politically and economically they will strike.

For more in depth information on the deception called the NEP, please read Anatoliy Golitsyn's New Lies For Old.
 [TOP]

If China wanted to attack the US for resources and land, couldn't they simply invade Russia's Far East?
 China could invade Siberia but why would it want to?

China can already obtain large amounts of natural resources from Siberia through various trade treaties with Russia. They have both realized that a mutually beneficial relationship is much better than conflict, especially since they both see the US as an enemy and are working to bring us down. Russia has the natural resources to sell and China has the hard currency (thanks to a mammoth trade imbalance with the US) to buy it with. Thus they are both able to get what they need and still work jointly against the US.

Also, consider this… Would you want to live in Siberia? I'm betting not. The land in the US is much more productive and hospitable than land in Siberia making it more attractive for China's version of Nazi Germany's well-known policy of Lebensraum.
 [TOP]

Why would Russia and China help terrorists? Don't they have their own terrorism problems?
 First, with Russia's "Chechen problem", Chechnya was not originally an Islamic state. The association of Chechnya with Islamic terror is largely a recent one. It is true that there are large numbers of followers of Islam in Chechnya but they were not the "Wahhabist" militant strain of Islam we have come to know today.

This association of Chechnya with Islamicism has been brought about largely due to the efforts of Russian disinformation. Disinformation which includes many events such as: There are large discrepancies with all of these events that have been chronicled previously by many which belie the Russian explanation of Chechens being behind these events. There is even the personal testimony of FSB defector Lt. Col. Alexandr Litvinenko that has tied the FSB to the 1999 apartment bombings and, affirmed the existance of Russian support of various terrorists and terror movements.

This all is not to say that there are no Islamic terrorists in Chechnya. Because there surely are now. This presence of Islamic terrorists in Chechnya is likely attributable to the fertile ground that Russian intelligence services have cultivated for such people and sentiment through their disinformation efforts.

Now, one is surely asking "Why would Russia go to all this effort?"

The answer is manifold. First, it was used to bring a "modern and dynamic" leader such as Vladimir Putin to the helm of Russian government. A type of leader that could successfully usher along the Final Phase. Secondly, it was a good way to devise excuses to roll back the false "freedoms" extended to the Russian citizenry during the times of glasnost and perestroika. This is currently being done much the same way as it was at the conclusion of Lenin's NEP but in a more measured and subtle way. Examples of this are the nationalization of natural resources and the companies dealing with them and, the removal of the Russian peoples' electoral freedom to elect their regional governors. And lastly, it is being done to bring about the sympathy of the West in an effort to endear others to a "brother country" suffering a similar plight and battle against Islamic terror.

There are large amounts of evidence that go against the claim that Russia is a victim of Islamic terror. Some such evidence includes: As for the Chinese, their problem with Uyghur Muslims is largely overblown like the Chechens. China has tried to use the September 11th attacks as an excuse to crack down on religion, subjugate a sub-class of people living within their border, and (like the Russians) gain Western sympathy toward their "plight". Any attacks by the Uyghurs against China can be attributed largely to China forcefully moving people into areas inhabited by the Uyghurs for centuries and, the Uyghurs using violent means to resist. China has tried to paint this resistance as a terrorist network with ties to al Queda and bin Laden.

China's terror victimology can be debunked for many of the same reasons as Russian victimology including support for terrorist movements and Middle East nations hostile to the US. Another aspect that supports the assertion that China is not the victim of terror but instead the purveyor is their official policy of “Unrestricted Warfare”. With this doctrine, China officially states that they will use unconventional means, including support for terrorists and terrorist groups, to wage war against a more conventionally powerful enemy. To learn more about this doctrine, please read Unrestricted Warfare: China's Master Plan to Destroy America.
 [TOP]

Wouldn't there be huge problems with logistics facing any forces invading the US?
 There would indeed be large logistical obstacles to overcome for a successful invasion of the United States to take place. However, the Trans-Asian Axis is well on their way to solving these problems.

The Chinese are the ones solving most of the logistical problems for the Trans-Asian via two major "companies" that are actually directly under the CCP's direct control. The first company being COSCO and the second being Hutchison-Whampoa.

COSCO has large number of cargo super-transports and RORO (roll-on/roll-off) ships in its inventory and, its numbers grow every year. The Chinese regard all of these COSCO vessels as the Chinese version of the merchant marine. Such use has been well documented including: There are of course many more documented uses of COSCO ships to support Chinese military and government endeavourers.

COSCO ships are not the only major concern. Other major concerns regarding COSCO involve their numerous shipping ports held in strategic locations that include the Panama Canal, numerous locations within South/Central America, and locations on both the East and West coasts of the US.

As mentioned, the other major Chinese company is Hutchison-Whampoa. They, like COSCO, have numerous shipping ports that are located in strategic locations throughout South/Central America, the Panama Canal, and the US. One of these notable locations is in the Bahamas where Hutchison-Whampoa has a mammoth shipping facility that even features an airstrip large enough to not only accommodate cargo aircraft but also military aircraft including bombers.

Of course, if one were to begin massive transport of troops and materiel immediately prior to an outset of hostilities, it would most surely be noticeable. However, if one were to over time gradually preposition troops and supplies, it would be much less susceptible to being noticed.

Such prepositioning is, of course, impossible to camouflage and does explain the events documented in Scott Gulbransen's book The Silent Invasion. Events such as sightings of Asian and possibly Russian soldiers in various Mexican and South/Central American locations, secretive shipments to various South/Central American locations that have military guards, and reports of non-indigenous military locations being established throughout South/Central America. The fact that there are so many left leaning countries in South/Central America that are increasingly hostile to the US, the large numbers of illegal aliens flowing across our southern border (estimations of upwards of 1 million not caught per year), and numerous documented reports of foreign military personnel (believed to be Mexican but could include others) crossing into the US which could be probes of our national defenses.
 [TOP]

Why would South/Central America, and more specifically Mexico, participate in such activities?
 South and Central America have always had problems with Socialist leaning governments. Despite the “end” of the Cold War, this problem has only gotten worse with many Socialist/Leftist leaders coming to power just recently. Like Russia and China, they too want to see the US fall from its number one position in the world even though they know that they themselves will never attain that position. It comes back to the whole “top dog” premise, everyone wants to take you down.

A big party to this South/Central American resentment is Mexico. Since 1848 when the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo was signed and US claims to the Southwest were recognized by Mexico, this resentment has been festering. Today, according to a Zogby poll taken in 2002, nearly 60% of Mexicans feel that the Southwestern US is their land that was stolen by the United States. As such, groups that were once on the fringe of society such as MEChA, La Raza, the Brown Berets, and other Reconquista/Aztlan type groups are becoming more and more mainstream within Hispanic communities in America.

The Trans-Asian Axis is not the first to recognize the strategic importance of South and Central America. Adolph Hitler’s Nazi Germany strove to make many inroads in South/Central America during World War II. He realized that one of the United States’ biggest weaknesses was its soft underbelly on its southern border. Hitler was ultimately unsuccessful in exploiting this weakness. The Trans-Asian Axis, on the other hand, is gradually and steadily making headway in this regard. For example:
 [TOP]

How does illegal immigration fit into the equation?
 As mentioned above, Mexico holds major resentment toward the United States for “stealing its land” and ultimately the complete success of the United States while Mexico remains a poor nation. Mexico sees its poorest and least educated citizens as a weapon to use against the United States by having them essentially re-colonize the territory previously forfeited to the US under the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo.

While it is true that a number of illegal aliens only want to work hard and make a better life for themselves, it doesn’t change the fact that they are criminals. They are criminals that make a mockery of our laws, those that work hard to abide by those laws to come here legally, and ignore our right to national sovereignty. If they choose to arbitrarily ignore our immigration laws, what other laws will they also choose to ignore?

Unlike the immigrants that work hard to come to the United States legally, the immigrants that are sneaking into the US are some of the least educated even by Third World standards. These uneducated individuals are a huge burden on our social infrastructure and are only getting worse. Legal immigrants often show much hard work and determination by choosing to abide by our immigration laws. This hard work and dedication is quite often associated with a desire to be educated and further that education.

It is also a truth that many of the illegal aliens coming here have extensive criminal backgrounds. They are often fugitives from their home country and involved in violent gang (such as MS-13) and drug activities. They invade the US and continue their drug and gang activity here in our cities and towns.

There is also an economic warfare aspect to this illegal immigration. Illegal aliens that are willing to work far below what is considered a fair wage drive down the standard of living for all Americans. They end up working jobs that Americans really are willing to work such as welders, drywallers, construction workers, farming jobs all just to name a few. In the end, an American will work any job as long, as it provides a fair wage, to put food on the table for either themselves or their family. A good question to ask is, “If Americans are not willing to do these jobs, who did them prior to the 1980s when large numbers of illegal aliens began invading America?”

Aside from driving American wages down and taking away jobs Americans will do, many illegal aliens also utilize the social infrastructure that is meant for American citizens that have fallen on hard times. These illegal aliens use fraudulent methods to obtain these social benefits. They end up: As previously mentioned, there are those that seek to inject a revolutionary class into American society. They fan the flames of illegal immigration in hopes of Balkanizing us and then coming in and taking what the believe is theirs. That class is the MEChA/La Raza/Reconquista/Aztlan crowd. And as mentioned above, there are likely over 7 million people (and rapidly growing) in the United States with this mindset.

In the end, what is a nation without borders?
 [TOP]

If the US is attacked, wouldn't NATO step in to help? After all, wasn't it formed to counter Soviet aggression?
 Today, NATO has largely become a token organization.

Many NATO nations are now unfriendly toward the United States. Nations such as France and Germany have acted against American interests by siding with Russia and China in various international issues. Other nations, such as Spain, are becoming more and more Socialist leaning and thus de facto against what America stands for and NATO originally stood for.

In addition to this fracturing of the original NATO countries, many former Soviet states are being allowed to join the alliance. The intentions for some of these nations joining the alliance cannot be guaranteed as not serving the interests of the TAA as enemy infiltrators. In fact, there has even been a movement within NATO to allow Russia itself to join! Something which is a complete antithesis to what NATO was meant to be.

If one wants proof that NATO will not come to the aid of the United States in a time of extreme need, one need not look any further in the past than 9/11. The most support America received from the NATO alliance in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 were some AWACS surveillance flights along the East Coast. All other assistance in Afghanistan was rendered by allies of America, not unified NATO efforts. The same applies to the threat faced from Iraq. Only America’s staunchest allies stepped in to help take care of a needed task. It was not a unified NATO effort that toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein.
 [TOP]

Russia is only selling weapons to China (and other rogue nations) because they desperately need the money. They aren't in alliance with them!
 The fact is that Russia's economy is doing very well. Especially since the price of oil has been as high as it has. With Russia being a major exporter of oil, they are bringing in very large profits. Because of this oil revenue, they have paid down much of their national and international debt and have large surpluses in many areas.

Besides very high oil revenues, Russia has also been the recipient of copious international financial aid and business investment, largely from the US, since the "end" of the Cold War. This aid and investment was rendered in the belief that helping Russia become a more democratic and market oriented nation would more likely cause them to be peaceful internationally and provide for greater prosperity and well-being for its citizens. This aid and investment numbers into the billions of dollars every year.

With the above in mind, the notion that Russia is hurting financially and thus has to sell weapons to unfriendly countries or else will starve is a completely fatuous notion. The only logical explanation for these sales are that they are allied with these nations and/or they know that these nations will use these weapons to cause problems for the United States therefore, furthering their long-range goals.
 [TOP]

You all are a bunch of conspiracy kooks! You are just a bunch of warmongers that want to hate the USSR back into existance so you have an enemy to fight! You are all full of ****! You people are so completely wrong that I can't believe it! Ad nauseam...
 Well, okay… If that is what you really believe, sign up with our message boards and logically debate facts with us rather than just contemptuously dismissing our message or laughing us off as kooks.
 [TOP]

How can I learn more about the Trans-Asian Axis?
 First we'd love to have you join up on our message boards. There you will find a cornucopia of information ranging from current events, news articles, and dynamic discussion on numerous related topics.

Secondly, we recommend a thorough reading of the books linked to in our Recommended Reading section on our site. Having a grasp of the information contained within many of those books will vastly help in understanding the dangers we face from the Trans-Asian Axis.

Thirdly, we also highly recommend browsing the links in our Links section. Those websites are related to the message that we here at TransAsianAxis.com are trying to get out. Those sites have a lot of great information on them for their specific topic areas.
 [TOP]











This page best viewed at 1024x768 with Firefox.
Get Firefox!